スキップしてメイン コンテンツに移動

Is War Human?

This poem poses a fundamental question: Can war truly be called human? Through reflections on nuclear weapons and the military use of artificial intelligence, it exposes the deception of nuclear deterrence, the killing of innocent civilians, and the emergence of autonomous lethal weapons systems (LAWS). As warfare becomes increasingly detached from human ethics and conscience, technological progress appears to accelerate the loss of humanity itself. The poem sounds a profound warning about this unsettling future.


“Is War Human?”

They threaten to drop nuclear bombs.
The threatened nation imagines Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
It recalls the Chernobyl disaster.
It remembers the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster after the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami.
People continue to live in fear
of radioactive contamination
that scars the earth for generations.
Its effects do not remain local;
they linger in both environment and human bodies.

That is why,
even when nations possess nuclear weapons,
they cannot truly use them.
To use them
is to invite retaliation
and destruction upon oneself.
And so more weapons are produced and stockpiled
only to restrain one another.
Powerful nations assert themselves
by preventing weaker nations from developing them by force.
Those who secretly possess them
refuse to reveal the truth.
Thus is maintained
the delicate balance of nuclear deterrence.
What a profoundly human—
and malicious—ethic this is.

The development of AI
continues to advance at astonishing speed.
When the United States attacked a school in Iraq,
innocent children were killed.
The excuse was that outdated intelligence
had identified it as a military facility.
What a hollow lie.
In an age when AI has elevated information warfare,
it is unthinkable
that attacks are decided by obsolete systems alone.
Targets are selected deliberately,
and someone presses the switch.
Without hesitation,
under orders,
a soldier obeys.
How could guilt survive there?
War abandons what it means to be human.

The military use of AI
will make attacks ever more precise and efficient.
To soldiers operating as if in a game,
the killing of enemy troops
feels unreal.
Ethics vanish;
even children can be killed without hesitation.
This is symbolized
by the cruel destruction and slaughter
in Palestine.

Soon AI itself
may attack without direct human command.
The age of
Autonomous Lethal Weapons Systems—LAWS—
is approaching.
Research toward practical deployment
is surely already underway.
Boundless dehumanization
will intensify the fierce competition
to develop weapons of war.
Vast sums of money
and brilliant human minds
will be consumed
by economic monsters.

War casts aside ethics,
becomes inhuman,
and continues to seek annihilation.
Is this merely science fiction,
foretelling a near future
ruled by LAWS?
Even the means to control them
may have to be entrusted
to AI itself.

Written on May 10, 2026. The footsteps of an unsettling age can already be heard.

このブログの人気の投稿

Knowing at Sunset (New Year’s Card, 2026)

his poem reflects on life as it is seen at sunset— not as an ending, but as a moment when past light, lingering warmth, and the promise of a new dawn quietly coexist. Knowing at sunset — the gradations of a life. Passion has not yet cooled; the days bathed in sunlight now lie distant. Life glows in the lingering afterlight. Melting into sunset — the strange encounters a life bestows. Benevolence remains precious still; with the sun at one ’ s back, shadows are cast. Life resounds in the hues of evening. Cherishing the beauty of sunset — the last story of a life. Embers have not yet burned out; in the stillness that reaches culmination, one is suffused by a new sun.

To Those Guided by Young Children

This poem listens to life as it is reflected in young children— their gaze, their silence, their small questions. Each moment asks something of us, quietly but unmistakably, calling not for sentiment, but for responsibility, care, and action. To Those Guided by Young Children To meet the gaze of a young child demands a sincerity that faces them head-on. In a young child’s tears, an anger that must not be indulged is questioned. In a young child’s smile, the meaning of selfless joy is questioned. In a young child’s gestures, the warmth of an embracing presence is questioned. In a young child’s fragile voice, our readiness to respond without delay is questioned. In a young child’s silence, the wisdom to sense the heart beyond words is questioned. In a young child’s small questions, our breadth of vision toward the world is questioned In the radiance of a young child’s life, our resolve to protect the present is questioned. The peace a young child seeks without cease mu...

A World of Right and Wrong

This poem examines a world where the line between right and wrong is deliberately blurred. By questioning language, justification, and power, it confronts the moral evasions that sustain domination and asks what happens when self-overcoming is refused.   A World of Right and Wrong   When facing a matter, we must examine our way of thinking. We must examine our use of words. We must examine our everyday conduct.   What is the basis that claims alignment with reason? What is the basis for asserting what is “ right ” ? What is the basis for believing one is doing good?   Is a slip of the tongue a lie meant to protect oneself? Is a mocking laugh arrogance that looks down on others? Is failure nothing more than shifting responsibility?   Self-serving values are proclaimed as legitimate. Self-centered ethics are boasted as humanitarian. Ego-driven morality is substituted for education.   One secures absolute c...